Privacy – Why The Fuss?

By -
I don’t understand what’s this fuss about privacy and government surveillance.

After all, we are willingly compromising our privacy when we use services like Google now, Siri and Social networking. The only difference between tech companies and the government is that the companies are invading your privacy to show you targeted ads and the government to save your ass!

And neither of them has a choice – why should companies spend billions in providing free services if they aren’t getting anything in return?
The government has no choice because the enemy is hiding among us. It’s running with us in the marathons, dining with us at the hotels, praying and shopping with us.  

Privacy is overrated.
If you can save me from the pain of watching cola ads and instead show me ads for something I want to buy - I am happy. I don’t see how to get this information other than tracking our online behavior.

If you can save even one life by preventing the next terror attack eavesdropping on a billion conversations - I am in. Most of us are publicly “Dear Diary- ing” our lives online anyways - you are kidding yourself if you hold an opposing point of view. Ask yourself why do I constantly check my social networks, browse through photos of people I don't even know well, enjoy celebrity gossip? What about their privacy?  And if you drool over the personal details of someone else’s life what gives you the right to sanctify your own?

The government overhearing our personal conversations is not the problem. The problem is what they do with that information. If they use it only to identify security threats, it’s ok -  but if they use it to typecast me as “an outspoken critic of current establishment – tag as a threat” - I should be worried.

Democracy dictates that the government should prove that it’s doing only the former. If it can’t or it won’t it should be replaced by the one that does.

I once read an article “A Brave New Dystopia” . In it the author compares two different visions of the future – one Orwellian, dominated by repressive surveillance and control, the other as envisioned by Huxley  - seduced by entertainment, technology and spectacle.  The world we think we are living in ended in the early 21st century – when terrorists entered our living room and we started living online – that’s when we entered the world of Brave New Dystopia.

Reality shows and cheap entertainment (read Dabangg, Jersey Shore, fascination with the next iPhone) characterize Huxley’s world. The recent PRISM & similar government surveillance programs characterize Orwellian vision.

I hope the future is neither - but a wiser society. A society that isn’t addicted to entertainment and technology, that doesn’t judge it’s people by their beliefs but recognizes them for their skills, a society that defines & encourages a better moral code, promotes knowledge and long-term happiness rather than superficial “fixes” in any form whether spiritual, religious or materialistic.

I see today’s world struggling to find this balance – people finding solace in theocracies & ideologies created in dark ages, abundance of information but lack of wisdom, the emergence of “professional amateurs” fullfilling our need for “the quick fix”  - with our collective knowledge of the last 400 years, I believe we can do much better.


Wish that we do. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Digital Marketing

By -
Being in digital marketing for the last 10 years, I get a lot of queries from fresh graduates on how to start their career in this domain. This post is for them. This is how I think about digital marketing.  The first step is to understand that digital marketing is not a radically new discipline but an extension of traditional marketing. The goal of marketing is to connect the sellers with the buyers and provide value to the buyer whilst making a profit for the seller. There are two major differences in traditional marketing(TM) and digital marketing(DM). 1. Reach 2. ROI With digital you can reach only a small % of the overall population as not everyone is on digital mediums viz. online, mobile & social networks.  For e.g. internet penetration in India is only 26%. So, if your Target Audience is digital only then can you expect to reach them via DM. To reach others you will need to use the traditional channels such as radio or TV. Measuring ROI is much sim...
Read more

Notes on – Demo conference

By -
Source: Meet Google's human search engine for innovation and www.demo.com There are several levels when we see companies: As partners – can they build applications on our platform & make the platform more valuable. Business development or licensing type of deal Acquisition Ventures – Find companies to invest in The sweet spot is mobile, location based services, social & e-commerce. " IBM, Digital, Sun, Apollo and Microsoft had their time. Now cloud based systems like Google, Facebook & others will have their time. It's a natural progression of business. Microsoft had a hell of run for 30 years. They're still a very powerful company. Very profitable, growing very well. So I wouldn't say they're going to go down; I would say the market has moved. " I think Kinect is a game changer and probably the most important hardware innovation of the decade. " Tablets are for consumption not for creation . " Agree but not entirely tr...
Read more

On Thinking Right

By -
Image
  “ Most people would rather die than think and many of them do!” BERTRAND RUSSELL After a long time, I had an amazing discussion with a close friend. It is interesting how the pandemic has shifted our attention from the trivia of on-demand entertainment and moved it to things that matter most. For me, a stimulating conversation matters most. A conversation where both parties present opposing point of views and have the courage, humility, and open-mindedness to change or at least think from others ‘point of view’. I have always believed in the power of Douglas Adams’ most powerful weapon in the Universe – a point of view gun. So many conflicts can be resolved by momentarily giving up our own POV and having a bit of empathy for the other side. A conversation that allows you to learn and grow is always the right kind of conversation. The only thing that is better than this kind of conversation is if it happens without anyone raising their voice. This was not a problem for me as ...
Read more